2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2000 Hallberg-Rassy 312003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassySabre
Year2000–20102003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA9.47 m (31.1 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL8.25 m (27.1 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.18 m (10.4 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft1.60 m (5.2 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area44.5 m² (479 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was penned by German Frers. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 measures 9.47m (31.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.18m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.72m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 · 2003 Sabre 402