Hunter 356 vs 1988 Westerly Corsair — Comparison

Hunter 356Hunter 356
VS
1988 Westerly Corsair1988 Westerly Corsair

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 3561988 Westerly Corsair
General
ManufacturerHunterWesterly
Year2000–20051988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGlenn HendersonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL9.30 m (30.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.53 m (11.6 ft)3.50 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,450 kg (5,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area53.0 m² (571 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 356
17.40
1988 Westerly Corsair
14.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 356
40.00
1988 Westerly Corsair
38.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 356
0.80
1988 Westerly Corsair
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 356
16.38
1988 Westerly Corsair
19.55

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 356 and 1988 Westerly Corsair represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1988 Westerly Corsair is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1988 Westerly Corsair was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1988 Westerly Corsair at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.50m beam. The 1988 Westerly Corsair is 0.18m longer than the Hunter 356. The 1988 Westerly Corsair displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Westerly Corsair, with an SA/D of 14.81 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1988 Westerly Corsair has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 38.6% for the 1988 Westerly Corsair, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Westerly Corsair is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 1988 Westerly Corsair