Hunter 356 vs 1992 Moody 41 — Comparison
Hunter 356
1992 Moody 41
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 356 | 1992 Moody 41 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Moody |
| Year | 2000–2005 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | UK |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Bill Dixon |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.82 m (35.5 ft) | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.53 m (11.6 ft) | 3.86 m (12.7 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) | 9,800 kg (21,605 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 53.0 m² (571 ft²) | 70.0 m² (754 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 360 L (95.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 356 and 1992 Moody 41 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 356 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1992 Moody 41 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The Hunter 356 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1992 Moody 41 was designed by Bill Dixon.
In terms of size, the Hunter 356 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.53m, compared to the 1992 Moody 41 at 12.50m (41.0ft) with a 3.86m beam. The 1992 Moody 41 is 1.68m longer than the Hunter 356. The 1992 Moody 41 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 356 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of sail area. The 1992 Moody 41, with an SA/D of 15.53 and 70.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 356 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1992 Moody 41 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the Hunter 356 and 38.8% for the 1992 Moody 41, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 356 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1992 Moody 41 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 360L water and 180L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1992 Moody 41 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1992 Moody 41 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 356 · 1992 Moody 41