2000 Najad 355 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison
1975 Pearson 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2000 Najad 355 | 1975 Pearson 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Najad | Pearson |
| Year | 2000–2010 | 1975–1982 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Sweden | USA |
| Designer | Judel/Vrolijk | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) | 2.74 m (9.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) | 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) | 30.0 m² (323 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 28 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 110 L (29.1 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2000 Najad 355 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s design by Najad from Sweden, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2000 Najad 355 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 2000 Najad 355 measures 10.72m (35.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.38m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 2.19m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 104% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2000 Najad 355 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2000 Najad 355 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2000 Najad 355 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2000 Najad 355 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 110L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2000 Najad 355 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2000 Najad 355 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2000 Najad 355 · 1975 Pearson 28