Bavaria 40 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

Bavaria 40Bavaria 40
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 401995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerBavariaFeeling
Year2001–20061995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
DesignerJ&J DesignPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA12.35 m (40.5 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL10.75 m (35.3 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam3.99 m (13.1 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area72.0 m² (775 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 40
17.56
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 40
30.59
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 40
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 40
16.39
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 40 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 40 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Bavaria 40 was penned by J&J Design. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 40 measures 12.35m (40.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.99m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The Bavaria 40 is 0.55m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The Bavaria 40 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 72.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 30.6% for the Bavaria 40 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 40 · 1995 Feeling 39