Hunter 380 vs 1990 Sabre 36 — Comparison

Hunter 380 Hunter 380
VS
1990 Sabre 36 1990 Sabre 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Hunter 380 1990 Sabre 36
General
Manufacturer Hunter Sabre
Year 2001–2005 1990–1998
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Glenn Henderson Roger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA 11.58 m (38.0 ft) 10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft 1.83 m (6.0 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,257 kg (15,999 lbs) 5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)
Ballast 2,722 kg (6,001 lbs) 2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 64.0 m² (689 ft²) 52.5 m² (565 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 28 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity 227 L (60.0 gal) 151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 380
17.35
1990 Sabre 36
16.34
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 380
37.51
1990 Sabre 36
41.53
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 380
0.78
1990 Sabre 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 380
17.27
1990 Sabre 36
19.29

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 380 and 1990 Sabre 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 380 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1990 Sabre 36 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The Hunter 380 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1990 Sabre 36 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the Hunter 380 measures 11.58m (38.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1990 Sabre 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 380 is 0.61m longer than the 1990 Sabre 36. The Hunter 380 displaces approximately 23% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 380 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.35 and 64.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Sabre 36, with an SA/D of 16.34 and 52.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 380 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Sabre 36 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 380 and 41.5% for the 1990 Sabre 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 380 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1990 Sabre 36 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Sabre 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS