2001 Hunter 410 vs 1986 Westerly Oceanlord — Comparison

2001 Hunter 410 2001 Hunter 410
VS
1986 Westerly Oceanlord 1986 Westerly Oceanlord

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2001 Hunter 410 1986 Westerly Oceanlord
General
Manufacturer Hunter Westerly
Year 2001–2006 1986–1992
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Glenn Henderson Ed Dubois
Dimensions
LOA 12.50 m (41.0 ft) 12.04 m (39.5 ft)
LWL 10.67 m (35.0 ft) 9.75 m (32.0 ft)
Beam 4.04 m (13.3 ft) 3.81 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.98 m (6.5 ft) 1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) 9,980 kg (22,002 lbs)
Ballast 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 74.3 m² (800 ft²) 68.0 m² (732 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 50 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 182 L (48.1 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 340 L (89.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 7
Cabins 3 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2001 Hunter 410
16.80
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2001 Hunter 410
38.10
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
36.36
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2001 Hunter 410
0.76
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2001 Hunter 410
18.10
1986 Westerly Oceanlord
23.70

Detailed Comparison

The 2001 Hunter 410 and 1986 Westerly Oceanlord represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Hunter 410 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 2001 Hunter 410 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 2001 Hunter 410 measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.04m, compared to the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord at 12.04m (39.5ft) with a 3.81m beam. The 2001 Hunter 410 is 0.46m longer than the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2001 Hunter 410 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2001 Hunter 410 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2001 Hunter 410 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 2001 Hunter 410 and 36.4% for the 1986 Westerly Oceanlord, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2001 Hunter 410 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 340L water and 182L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Westerly Oceanlord is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2001 Hunter 410 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2001 Hunter 410 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS