2001 Hunter 410 vs 2015 ClubSwan 36 — Comparison
2001 Hunter 410
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2001 Hunter 410 | 2015 ClubSwan 36 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Nautor Swan |
| Year | 2001–2006 | 2015 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Finland |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Juan Kouyoumdjian |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 11.00 m (36.1 ft) |
| LWL | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 9.90 m (32.5 ft) |
| Beam | 4.04 m (13.3 ft) | 3.30 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,525 kg (20,999 lbs) | 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,629 kg (8,001 lbs) | 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 74.3 m² (800 ft²) | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 40 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 40 L (10.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 60 L (15.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 4 |
| Cabins | 3 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2001 Hunter 410 and 2015 ClubSwan 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Hunter 410 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern offering from Nautor Swan from Finland. The 2001 Hunter 410 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was designed by Juan Kouyoumdjian.
In terms of size, the 2001 Hunter 410 measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.04m, compared to the 2015 ClubSwan 36 at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.30m beam. The 2001 Hunter 410 is 1.50m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 2001 Hunter 410 displaces approximately 98% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2001 Hunter 410 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.80 and 74.3 m² of sail area. The 2015 ClubSwan 36, with an SA/D of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2001 Hunter 410 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has a comfort ratio of 14.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 2001 Hunter 410 and 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2001 Hunter 410 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L water and 40L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2001 Hunter 410 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2001 Hunter 410 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2001 Hunter 410 · 2015 ClubSwan 36