2015 ClubSwan 36 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

2015 ClubSwan 36 2015 ClubSwan 36
VS
2014 Elan 400 2014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2015 ClubSwan 36 2014 Elan 400
General
Manufacturer Nautor Swan Elan
Year 2015 2014–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Finland Slovenia
Designer Juan Kouyoumdjian Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 11.00 m (36.1 ft) 12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL 9.90 m (32.5 ft) 10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam 3.30 m (10.8 ft) 3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft 2.30 m (7.5 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,800 kg (10,582 lbs) 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast 1,700 kg (3,748 lbs) 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 15 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 40 L (10.6 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 60 L (15.9 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 4 7
Cabins 1 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2015 ClubSwan 36
23.21
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2015 ClubSwan 36
35.42
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2015 ClubSwan 36
0.78
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2015 ClubSwan 36
14.37
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 is a modern design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 was penned by Juan Kouyoumdjian. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 measures 11.00m (36.1ft) overall with a beam of 3.30m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 1.07m longer than the 2015 ClubSwan 36. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 23.21 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.4% for the 2015 ClubSwan 36 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2015 ClubSwan 36 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 60L of water capacity and 40L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2014 Elan 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2015 ClubSwan 36 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS