Hunter 450 vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

Hunter 450
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHunter 4501987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerHunterCape Dory
Year2001–20061987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGlenn HendersonCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA13.72 m (45.0 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL11.89 m (39.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam4.27 m (14.0 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,886 kg (23,999 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area86.0 m² (926 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity341 L (90.1 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hunter 450
17.79
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hunter 450
37.50
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hunter 450
0.77
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hunter 450
15.63
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The Hunter 450 and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 450 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The Hunter 450 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the Hunter 450 measures 13.72m (45.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.27m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Hunter 450 is 1.53m longer than the 1987 Cape Dory 40. The Hunter 450 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hunter 450 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.79 and 86.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 450 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hunter 450 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 37.5% for the Hunter 450 and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hunter 450 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 341L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 450 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 450 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hunter 450 · 1987 Cape Dory 40