2001 Nautor Swan 42 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2001 Nautor Swan 42 | 2013 Elan 350 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Nautor Swan | Elan |
| Year | 2001–2006 | 2013–2018 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Finland | Slovenia |
| Designer | German Frers | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.80 m (42.0 ft) | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.97 m (36.0 ft) | 9.30 m (30.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) | 3.46 m (11.4 ft) |
| Draft | 2.30 m (7.5 ft) | 2.00 m (6.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,300 kg (20,503 lbs) | 6,100 kg (13,448 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,800 kg (8,378 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 82.0 m² (883 ft²) | 58.0 m² (624 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 160 L (42.3 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 300 L (79.3 gal) | 170 L (44.9 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is a 2000s design by Nautor Swan from Finland, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 was penned by German Frers. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 is 2.13m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.84 and 82.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2001 Nautor Swan 42 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2001 Nautor Swan 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2001 Nautor Swan 42 · 2013 Elan 350