2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 vs 1979 Pearson 37 — Comparison

2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
VS
1979 Pearson 371979 Pearson 37

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Hallberg-Rassy 461979 Pearson 37
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyPearson
Year2002–20121979–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUSA
DesignerGerman FrersWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA14.05 m (46.1 ft)11.28 m (37.0 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)3.43 m (11.3 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)7,258 kg (16,001 lbs)
Ballast5,000 kg (11,023 lbs)3,084 kg (6,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area91.0 m² (980 ft²)56.0 m² (603 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity600 L (158.5 gal)190 L (50.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
16.72
1979 Pearson 37
15.18
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
38.46
1979 Pearson 37
42.49
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
0.72
1979 Pearson 37
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
19.19
1979 Pearson 37
24.10

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 1979 Pearson 37 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1979 Pearson 37 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 was penned by German Frers. The 1979 Pearson 37 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 measures 14.05m (46.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 1979 Pearson 37 at 11.28m (37.0ft) with a 3.43m beam. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is 2.77m longer than the 1979 Pearson 37. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 displaces approximately 79% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.72 and 91.0 m² of sail area. The 1979 Pearson 37, with an SA/D of 15.18 and 56.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1979 Pearson 37 has a comfort ratio of 24.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 42.5% for the 1979 Pearson 37, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 1979 Pearson 37 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 190L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Pearson 37 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 · 1979 Pearson 37