2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Hallberg-Rassy 461995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyFeeling
Year2002–20121995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenFrance
DesignerGerman FrersPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA14.05 m (46.1 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast5,000 kg (11,023 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area91.0 m² (980 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity600 L (158.5 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
16.72
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
38.46
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
0.72
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
19.19
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 was penned by German Frers. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 measures 14.05m (46.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is 2.25m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.72 and 91.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1995 Feeling 39 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1995 Feeling 39 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 · 1995 Feeling 39