2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2002 Hallberg-Rassy 462010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyHallberg-Rassy
Year2002–20122010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenSweden
DesignerGerman FrersGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA14.05 m (46.1 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL11.70 m (38.4 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam4.20 m (13.8 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft2.10 m (6.9 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement13,000 kg (28,660 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast5,000 kg (11,023 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area91.0 m² (980 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine75 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity600 L (158.5 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
16.72
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
38.46
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
0.72
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46
19.19
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is a 2000s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 was penned by German Frers. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 measures 14.05m (46.1ft) overall with a beam of 4.20m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 is 1.97m longer than the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40. The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.72 and 91.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.5% for the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 600L of water capacity and 300L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2002 Hallberg-Rassy 46 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40