Bavaria 42 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

Bavaria 42Bavaria 42
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 42Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerBavariaHunter
Year2003–20082000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.99 m (42.6 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL11.29 m (37.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam4.06 m (13.3 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity350 L (92.5 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 42
18.15
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 42
31.18
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 42
0.77
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 42
15.87
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 42 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 42 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Bavaria 42 was penned by J&J Design. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 42 measures 12.99m (42.6ft) overall with a beam of 4.06m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Bavaria 42 is 2.17m longer than the Hunter 356. The Bavaria 42 displaces approximately 71% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 31.2% for the Bavaria 42 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 356 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 42 · Hunter 356