Bavaria 42 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

Bavaria 42Bavaria 42
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 422013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerBavariaElan
Year2003–20082013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
DesignerJ&J DesignRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.99 m (42.6 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL11.29 m (37.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam4.06 m (13.3 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,300 kg (20,503 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area79.0 m² (850 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity350 L (92.5 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 42
18.15
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 42
31.18
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 42
0.77
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 42
15.87
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 42 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 42 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Bavaria 42 was penned by J&J Design. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 42 measures 12.99m (42.6ft) overall with a beam of 4.06m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The Bavaria 42 is 2.32m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The Bavaria 42 displaces approximately 52% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 42 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.15 and 79.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 42 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 42 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.2% for the Bavaria 42 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 42 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 42 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 42 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 42 · 2013 Elan 350