2003 Dufour 34 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

2003 Dufour 342003 Dufour 34
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Dufour 341976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerDufourEricson
Year2003–20071976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciBruce King
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL8.95 m (29.4 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.37 m (11.1 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine20 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Dufour 34
17.12
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Dufour 34
32.73
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Dufour 34
0.76
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Dufour 34
19.14
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Dufour 34 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Dufour 34 is a 2000s design by Dufour from France, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 2003 Dufour 34 was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 2003 Dufour 34 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.37m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 2003 Dufour 34 is 1.46m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 2003 Dufour 34 displaces approximately 73% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Dufour 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.12 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Dufour 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Dufour 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the 2003 Dufour 34 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Dufour 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Dufour 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Dufour 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Dufour 34 · 1976 Ericson 29