2003 Dufour 34 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

2003 Dufour 342003 Dufour 34
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Dufour 341983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerDufourIrwin
Year2003–20071983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.95 m (29.4 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.37 m (11.1 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,500 kg (12,125 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.5 m² (565 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine20 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity75 L (19.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity140 L (37.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Dufour 34
17.12
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Dufour 34
32.73
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Dufour 34
0.76
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Dufour 34
19.14
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Dufour 34 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Dufour 34 is a 2000s design by Dufour from France, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 2003 Dufour 34 was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 2003 Dufour 34 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.37m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 2003 Dufour 34 is 0.55m longer than the 1983 Irwin 32. The 2003 Dufour 34 displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Dufour 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.12 and 52.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2003 Dufour 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Dufour 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 32.7% for the 2003 Dufour 34 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Dufour 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L of water capacity and 75L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Dufour 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Dufour 34 · 1983 Irwin 32