2003 Hunter 41 AC vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC 2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2003 Hunter 41 AC 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
Manufacturer Hunter Hallberg-Rassy
Year 2003–2007 2010–2017
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Glenn Henderson German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 12.50 m (41.0 ft) 12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL 10.82 m (35.5 ft) 10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam 4.09 m (13.4 ft) 3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 1.52 m (5.0 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 9,072 kg (20,000 lbs) 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 73.2 m² (788 ft²) 73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Shoal draft Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 40 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 151 L (39.9 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity 303 L (80.0 gal) 380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 8 6
Cabins 3 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 0.42m longer than the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS