2003 Hunter 41 AC vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 ACHanse 315
General
ManufacturerHunterHanse
Year2003–20072010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerGlenn Hendersonjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths84
Cabins31

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 2.85m longer than the Hanse 315. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 116% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 315 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · Hanse 315