2003 Hunter 41 AC vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 AC2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerHunterBeneteau
Year2003–20072013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerGlenn HendersonVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths82
Cabins31

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 2.40m longer than the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 163% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3