2003 Hunter 41 AC vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

2003 Hunter 41 AC
VS
2014 Elan 4002014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Hunter 41 AC2014 Elan 400
General
ManufacturerHunterElan
Year2003–20072014–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerGlenn HendersonRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA12.50 m (41.0 ft)12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL10.82 m (35.5 ft)10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam4.09 m (13.4 ft)3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area73.2 m² (788 ft²)76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeShoal draftFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths87
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
17.10
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
35.00
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
0.79
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Hunter 41 AC
16.65
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC measures 12.50m (41.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.09m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC is 0.43m longer than the 2014 Elan 400. The 2003 Hunter 41 AC displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.10 and 73.2 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 35.0% for the 2003 Hunter 41 AC and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Hunter 41 AC provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2014 Elan 400 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Hunter 41 AC offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Hunter 41 AC · 2014 Elan 400