1975 Pearson 39 vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison

1975 Pearson 39 1975 Pearson 39
VS
2014 Elan 400 2014 Elan 400

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1975 Pearson 39 2014 Elan 400
General
Manufacturer Pearson Elan
Year 1975–1980 2014–2018
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Slovenia
Designer William Shaw Rob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA 11.89 m (39.0 ft) 12.07 m (39.6 ft)
LWL 9.45 m (31.0 ft) 10.50 m (34.4 ft)
Beam 3.51 m (11.5 ft) 3.90 m (12.8 ft)
Draft 1.68 m (5.5 ft) 2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement 7,711 kg (17,000 lbs) 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 60.8 m² (654 ft²) 76.0 m² (818 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 28 HP 30 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity 189 L (49.9 gal) 250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 7
Cabins 2 3

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1975 Pearson 39
15.83
2014 Elan 400
18.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1975 Pearson 39
41.17
2014 Elan 400
31.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1975 Pearson 39
0.71
2014 Elan 400
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1975 Pearson 39
21.46
2014 Elan 400
17.08

Detailed Comparison

The 1975 Pearson 39 and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1975 Pearson 39 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1975 Pearson 39 was penned by William Shaw. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1975 Pearson 39 measures 11.89m (39.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 0.18m longer than the 1975 Pearson 39. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1975 Pearson 39 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.83 and 60.8 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1975 Pearson 39 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1975 Pearson 39 and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1975 Pearson 39 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1975 Pearson 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS