2003 Sabre 402 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

2003 Sabre 402
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2003 Sabre 4021976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerSabreC&C Yachts
Year2003–20101976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerJim TaylorCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.36 m (34.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.72 m (12.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area66.0 m² (710 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity227 L (60.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2003 Sabre 402
18.32
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 2003 Sabre 402 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 2003 Sabre 402 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 2003 Sabre 402 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.72m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 2.13m longer than the 1976 C&C 33. The 2003 Sabre 402 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2003 Sabre 402 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2003 Sabre 402 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2003 Sabre 402 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L of water capacity and 151L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2003 Sabre 402 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2003 Sabre 402 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2003 Sabre 402 · 1976 C&C 33