2004 Bavaria 38 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

2004 Bavaria 38
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Bavaria 381973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerBavariaRanger
Year2004–20091973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
DesignerJ&J DesignGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA11.72 m (38.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.40 m (34.1 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.85 m (6.1 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,500 kg (16,535 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,500 kg (5,512 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area63.0 m² (678 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine30 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.70
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Bavaria 38
33.33
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Bavaria 38
0.77
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Bavaria 38
16.94
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Bavaria 38 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Bavaria 38 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 2004 Bavaria 38 was penned by J&J Design. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 2004 Bavaria 38 measures 11.72m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 2004 Bavaria 38 is 1.66m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 2004 Bavaria 38 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Bavaria 38 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.70 and 63.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Bavaria 38 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Bavaria 38 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Bavaria 38 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 200L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Bavaria 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Bavaria 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Bavaria 38 · 1973 Ranger 33