Bavaria 46 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison

Bavaria 46Bavaria 46
VS
1995 Feeling 39

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationBavaria 461995 Feeling 39
General
ManufacturerBavariaFeeling
Year2004–20091995–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
DesignerJ&J DesignPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA14.27 m (46.8 ft)11.80 m (38.7 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
Beam4.35 m (14.3 ft)3.78 m (12.4 ft)
Draft2.15 m (7.1 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement11,200 kg (24,692 lbs)7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)
Ballast3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)3,000 kg (6,614 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area95.0 m² (1,023 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity450 L (118.9 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths107
Cabins43

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Bavaria 46
19.28
1995 Feeling 39
17.05
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Bavaria 46
31.25
1995 Feeling 39
38.46
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Bavaria 46
0.78
1995 Feeling 39
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Bavaria 46
14.30
1995 Feeling 39
18.21

Detailed Comparison

The Bavaria 46 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Bavaria 46 is a 2000s design by Bavaria from Germany, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Bavaria 46 was penned by J&J Design. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the Bavaria 46 measures 14.27m (46.8ft) overall with a beam of 4.35m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The Bavaria 46 is 2.47m longer than the 1995 Feeling 39. The Bavaria 46 displaces approximately 44% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Bavaria 46 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 19.28 and 95.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 46 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Bavaria 46 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 14.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.3% for the Bavaria 46 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Bavaria 46 provides 10 berths in 4 cabins with 450L of water capacity and 250L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 46 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 46 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Bavaria 46 · 1995 Feeling 39