Hanse 370 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

Hanse 370
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 370Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerHanseHunter
Year2004–20081991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA11.40 m (37.4 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL10.10 m (33.1 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.63 m (11.9 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.90 m (6.2 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area60.0 m² (646 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine29 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity130 L (34.3 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity250 L (66.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 370
16.98
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 370
30.88
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 370
0.77
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 370
17.05
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 370 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 370 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The Hanse 370 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the Hanse 370 measures 11.40m (37.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.63m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Hanse 370 is 2.26m longer than the Hunter 30. The Hanse 370 displaces approximately 76% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 370 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 60.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 370 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 370 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 30.9% for the Hanse 370 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 370 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 250L of water capacity and 130L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 370 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 370 · Hunter 30