Hanse 430 vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

Hanse 430
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 4302013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerHanseElan
Year2004–20092013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySlovenia
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA13.10 m (43.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL11.40 m (37.4 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam4.10 m (13.5 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft2.05 m (6.7 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast2,900 kg (6,393 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area81.0 m² (872 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity350 L (92.5 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 430
18.74
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 430
31.52
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 430
0.78
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 430
15.21
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 430 and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 430 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Hanse 430 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Hanse 430 measures 13.10m (43.0ft) overall with a beam of 4.10m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The Hanse 430 is 2.43m longer than the 2013 Elan 350. The Hanse 430 displaces approximately 51% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 430 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.74 and 81.0 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 430 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 430 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.5% for the Hanse 430 and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 430 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 350L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2013 Elan 350 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 430 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 430 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 430 · 2013 Elan 350