2004 Hunter 466 vs Dufour 40 — Comparison
2004 Hunter 466
Dufour 40
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2004 Hunter 466 | Dufour 40 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Dufour |
| Year | 2004–2008 | 2007–2012 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | France |
| Designer | Glenn Henderson | Umberto Felci |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 14.17 m (46.5 ft) | 12.05 m (39.5 ft) |
| LWL | 12.50 m (41.0 ft) | 10.55 m (34.6 ft) |
| Beam | 4.37 m (14.3 ft) | 3.85 m (12.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 12,247 kg (27,000 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 90.5 m² (974 ft²) | 68.0 m² (732 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 160 L (42.3 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 379 L (100.1 gal) | 300 L (79.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 8 | 8 |
| Cabins | 3 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2004 Hunter 466 and Dufour 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the Dufour 40 is a 2000s offering from Dufour from France. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The Dufour 40 was designed by Umberto Felci.
In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the Dufour 40 at 12.05m (39.5ft) with a 3.85m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 2.12m longer than the Dufour 40. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The Dufour 40, with an SA/D of 17.56 and 68.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Dufour 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Dufour 40 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 30.8% for the Dufour 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Dufour 40 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L water and 160L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Dufour 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Dufour 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · Dufour 40