2004 Hunter 466 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

2004 Hunter 4662004 Hunter 466
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 402010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2004 Hunter 4662010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
ManufacturerHunterHallberg-Rassy
Year2004–20082010–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerGlenn HendersonGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA14.17 m (46.5 ft)12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL12.50 m (41.0 ft)10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam4.37 m (14.3 ft)3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement12,247 kg (27,000 lbs)9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area90.5 m² (974 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity379 L (100.1 gal)380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2004 Hunter 466
17.30
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2004 Hunter 466
33.33
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2004 Hunter 466
0.76
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2004 Hunter 466
15.61
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The 2004 Hunter 466 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2004 Hunter 466 is a 2000s design by Hunter from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 2004 Hunter 466 was penned by Glenn Henderson. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the 2004 Hunter 466 measures 14.17m (46.5ft) overall with a beam of 4.37m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2004 Hunter 466 is 2.09m longer than the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40. The 2004 Hunter 466 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2004 Hunter 466 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.30 and 90.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2004 Hunter 466 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2004 Hunter 466 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 15.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 33.3% for the 2004 Hunter 466 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2004 Hunter 466 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 379L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2004 Hunter 466 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2004 Hunter 466 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2004 Hunter 466 · 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40