2005 Hanse 312 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

2005 Hanse 312 2005 Hanse 312
VS
1977 Cal 33 1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 2005 Hanse 312 1977 Cal 33
General
Manufacturer Hanse Cal
Year 2005–2008 1977–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country Germany USA
Designer Judel/Vrolijk Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA 9.55 m (31.3 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 8.50 m (27.9 ft) 8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam 3.25 m (10.7 ft) 3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft 1.75 m (5.7 ft) 1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement 4,300 kg (9,480 lbs) 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 47.0 m² (506 ft²) 43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 18 HP
Fuel Capacity 55 L (14.5 gal) 68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity 100 L (26.4 gal) 114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 5 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Hanse 312
18.06
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Hanse 312
32.56
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Hanse 312
0.80
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Hanse 312
17.69
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Hanse 312 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Hanse 312 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The 2005 Hanse 312 was penned by Judel/Vrolijk. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 2005 Hanse 312 measures 9.55m (31.3ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 is 0.51m longer than the 2005 Hanse 312. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 21% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Hanse 312 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.06 and 47.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 2005 Hanse 312 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Hanse 312 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 32.6% for the 2005 Hanse 312 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Hanse 312 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L of water capacity and 55L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2005 Hanse 312 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1977 Cal 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS