1977 Cal 33 vs 1975 Pearson 28 — Comparison

1977 Cal 33 1977 Cal 33
VS
1975 Pearson 28 1975 Pearson 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification 1977 Cal 33 1975 Pearson 28
General
Manufacturer Cal Pearson
Year 1977–1982 1975–1982
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA USA
Designer Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt William Shaw
Dimensions
LOA 10.06 m (33.0 ft) 8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL 8.08 m (26.5 ft) 7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam 3.20 m (10.5 ft) 2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft 1.60 m (5.2 ft) 1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement 5,216 kg (11,499 lbs) 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)
Ballast 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) 1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 43.0 m² (463 ft²) 30.0 m² (323 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 18 HP 10 HP
Fuel Capacity 68 L (18.0 gal) 38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 6 5
Cabins 2 1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Cal 33
14.53
1975 Pearson 28
14.83
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Cal 33
41.74
1975 Pearson 28
43.08
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Cal 33
0.74
1975 Pearson 28
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Cal 33
22.63
1975 Pearson 28
21.23

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Cal 33 and 1975 Pearson 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s design by Cal from USA, while the 1975 Pearson 28 is a 1970s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1977 Cal 33 was penned by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt. The 1975 Pearson 28 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1977 Cal 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1975 Pearson 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1975 Pearson 28. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 77% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Cal 33 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1975 Pearson 28, with an SA/D of 14.83 and 30.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1975 Pearson 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Cal 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1975 Pearson 28 has a comfort ratio of 21.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33 and 43.1% for the 1975 Pearson 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Cal 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1975 Pearson 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1975 Pearson 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1977 Cal 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS