Hanse 320 vs 1977 Cal 33 — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
1977 Cal 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3201977 Cal 33
General
ManufacturerHanseCal
Year2005–20101977–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coBill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1977 Cal 33
14.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1977 Cal 33
41.74
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1977 Cal 33
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1977 Cal 33
22.63

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1977 Cal 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1977 Cal 33 is a 1970s offering from Cal from USA. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1977 Cal 33 was designed by Bill Lapworth / C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1977 Cal 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1977 Cal 33 is 0.14m longer than the Hanse 320. The 1977 Cal 33 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1977 Cal 33, with an SA/D of 14.53 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1977 Cal 33 has a comfort ratio of 22.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 41.7% for the 1977 Cal 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1977 Cal 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Cal 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1977 Cal 33