Hanse 320 vs 1982 Westerly Konsort — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3201982 Westerly Konsort
General
ManufacturerHanseWesterly
Year2005–20101982–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUK
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)9.50 m (31.2 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 1982 Westerly Konsort represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1982 Westerly Konsort at 9.50m (31.2ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.42m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 1% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Westerly Konsort, with an SA/D of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1982 Westerly Konsort has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 1982 Westerly Konsort offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 1982 Westerly Konsort