Hanse 320 vs 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 — Comparison

Hanse 320Hanse 320
VS
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3202000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
General
ManufacturerHanseHallberg-Rassy
Year2005–20102000–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanySweden
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coGerman Frers
Dimensions
LOA9.92 m (32.5 ft)9.47 m (31.1 ft)
LWL8.80 m (28.9 ft)8.25 m (27.1 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.18 m (10.4 ft)
Draft1.70 m (5.6 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area46.0 m² (495 ft²)44.5 m² (479 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity90 L (23.8 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 320
16.90
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 320
30.43
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
40.22
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 320
0.79
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 320
17.40
2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31
20.39

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 320 and 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 320 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Hanse 320 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Hanse 320 measures 9.92m (32.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 at 9.47m (31.1ft) with a 3.18m beam. The Hanse 320 is 0.45m longer than the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 320 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of sail area. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 320 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 320 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 30.4% for the Hanse 320 and 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 320 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 90L of fuel. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 320 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 320 · 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31