2005 Sabre 426 vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

2005 Sabre 4262005 Sabre 426
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification2005 Sabre 426Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerSabreHunter
Year2005–20122000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerJim TaylorGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA12.95 m (42.5 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.96 m (13.0 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.98 m (6.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,979 kg (22,000 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area77.5 m² (834 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity303 L (80.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
2005 Sabre 426
16.99
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
2005 Sabre 426
38.64
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
2005 Sabre 426
0.74
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
2005 Sabre 426
19.02
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 2005 Sabre 426 and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The 2005 Sabre 426 is 2.13m longer than the Hunter 356. The 2005 Sabre 426 displaces approximately 83% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2005 Sabre 426 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2005 Sabre 426 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · Hunter 356