2005 Sabre 426 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison
2005 Sabre 426
2010 Elan 340
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 2005 Sabre 426 | 2010 Elan 340 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Elan |
| Year | 2005–2012 | 2010–2014 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | Jim Taylor | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 12.95 m (42.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.96 m (13.0 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 9,979 kg (22,000 lbs) | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 77.5 m² (834 ft²) | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 55 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 189 L (49.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 303 L (80.0 gal) | 160 L (42.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 2005 Sabre 426 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 2005 Sabre 426 is a 2000s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 2005 Sabre 426 was penned by Jim Taylor. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 2005 Sabre 426 measures 12.95m (42.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.96m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2005 Sabre 426 is 2.59m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The 2005 Sabre 426 displaces approximately 72% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 2005 Sabre 426 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.99 and 77.5 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 2005 Sabre 426 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.6% for the 2005 Sabre 426 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 2005 Sabre 426 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 303L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2005 Sabre 426 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 2005 Sabre 426 · 2010 Elan 340