Catalina 385 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

Catalina 385 Catalina 385
VS
1984 Moody 33 1984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 385 1984 Moody 33
General
Manufacturer Catalina Moody
Year 2006–2014 1984–1990
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA UK
Designer Gerry Douglas Bill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA 11.73 m (38.5 ft) 10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL 10.21 m (33.5 ft) 8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft 2.06 m (6.8 ft) 1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 20 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity 242 L (63.9 gal) 140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The Catalina 385 is 1.67m longer than the 1984 Moody 33. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The Catalina 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS