Catalina 385 vs 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 — Comparison

Catalina 385 Catalina 385
VS
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification Catalina 385 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
General
Manufacturer Catalina Hallberg-Rassy
Year 2006–2014 2010–2017
Type Sloop Sloop
Country USA Sweden
Designer Gerry Douglas German Frers
Dimensions
LOA 11.73 m (38.5 ft) 12.08 m (39.6 ft)
LWL 10.21 m (33.5 ft) 10.40 m (34.1 ft)
Beam 3.76 m (12.3 ft) 3.82 m (12.5 ft)
Draft 2.06 m (6.8 ft) 1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) 9,200 kg (20,283 lbs)
Ballast 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) 3,500 kg (7,716 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area 65.0 m² (700 ft²) 73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull Material Fiberglass Fiberglass
Keel Type Fin Fin
Engine & Tanks
Engine 35 HP 55 HP
Fuel Capacity 114 L (30.1 gal) 200 L (52.8 gal)
Water Capacity 242 L (63.9 gal) 380 L (100.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths 7 6
Cabins 2 2

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
16.89
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
38.04
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40
19.94

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is a modern offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 was designed by German Frers.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 at 12.08m (39.6ft) with a 3.82m beam. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is 0.35m longer than the Catalina 385. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, with an SA/D of 16.89 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 38.0% for the 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 380L water and 200L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Hallberg-Rassy 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

VS