Catalina 385 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison
1984 Pearson 34
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Catalina 385 | 1984 Pearson 34 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Catalina | Pearson |
| Year | 2006–2014 | 1984–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Gerry Douglas | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 11.73 m (38.5 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 10.21 m (33.5 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.76 m (12.3 ft) | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) |
| Draft | 2.06 m (6.8 ft) | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 8,165 kg (18,001 lbs) | 5,443 kg (12,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 65.0 m² (700 ft²) | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 35 HP | 20 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 242 L (63.9 gal) | 152 L (40.2 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Catalina 385 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Catalina 385 is 1.37m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 Pearson 34 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Catalina 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · 1984 Pearson 34