Catalina 385 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

Catalina 385
VS
1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3851988 Moody 36
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year2006–20141988–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerGerry DouglasBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA11.73 m (38.5 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity242 L (63.9 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The Catalina 385 is 0.76m longer than the 1988 Moody 36. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Catalina 385 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 385 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · 1988 Moody 36