Catalina 385 vs Hunter 31 — Comparison

Catalina 385
VS
Hunter 31Hunter 31

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 385Hunter 31
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year2006–20142000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA11.73 m (38.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.12 m (10.2 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity242 L (63.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
Hunter 31
17.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
Hunter 31
38.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
Hunter 31
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
Hunter 31
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and Hunter 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 31 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The Hunter 31 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the Hunter 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.12m beam. The Catalina 385 is 2.28m longer than the Hunter 31. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 31, with an SA/D of 17.51 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The Hunter 31 has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 38.9% for the Hunter 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The Hunter 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 385 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · Hunter 31