Catalina 385 vs 2003 Sabre 402 — Comparison

Catalina 385
VS
2003 Sabre 402

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3852003 Sabre 402
General
ManufacturerCatalinaSabre
Year2006–20142003–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGerry DouglasJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA11.73 m (38.5 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.72 m (12.2 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)66.0 m² (710 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity242 L (63.9 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths77
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
2003 Sabre 402
16.54
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
2003 Sabre 402
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
2003 Sabre 402
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
2003 Sabre 402
18.32

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 2003 Sabre 402 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2003 Sabre 402 is a 2000s offering from Sabre from USA. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2003 Sabre 402 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2003 Sabre 402 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.72m beam. The 2003 Sabre 402 is 0.46m longer than the Catalina 385.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 2003 Sabre 402, with an SA/D of 16.54 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2003 Sabre 402 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2003 Sabre 402 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 40.0% for the 2003 Sabre 402, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2003 Sabre 402 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 385 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2003 Sabre 402 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · 2003 Sabre 402