Catalina 385 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison

Catalina 385
VS
2010 Elan 3402010 Elan 340

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationCatalina 3852010 Elan 340
General
ManufacturerCatalinaElan
Year2006–20142010–2014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerGerry DouglasRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA11.73 m (38.5 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL10.21 m (33.5 ft)9.00 m (29.5 ft)
Beam3.76 m (12.3 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft2.06 m (6.8 ft)1.95 m (6.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement8,165 kg (18,001 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)1,750 kg (3,858 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area65.0 m² (700 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine35 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity242 L (63.9 gal)160 L (42.3 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Catalina 385
16.29
2010 Elan 340
17.31
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Catalina 385
38.89
2010 Elan 340
30.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Catalina 385
0.75
2010 Elan 340
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Catalina 385
18.89
2010 Elan 340
19.73

Detailed Comparison

The Catalina 385 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Catalina 385 is a 2000s design by Catalina from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The Catalina 385 was penned by Gerry Douglas. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the Catalina 385 measures 11.73m (38.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.76m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Catalina 385 is 1.37m longer than the 2010 Elan 340. The Catalina 385 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Catalina 385 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.29 and 65.0 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Catalina 385 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.9% for the Catalina 385 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Catalina 385 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 242L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2010 Elan 340 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 385 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Catalina 385 · 2010 Elan 340