Hanse 342 vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison
Hanse 342
1984 Ericson 38
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | 1984 Ericson 38 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Ericson |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1984–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Bruce King / Ron Holland |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.98 m (6.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 60.0 m² (646 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 30 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 200 L (52.8 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 1.28m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1984 Ericson 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1984 Ericson 38