Hanse 342 vs 1985 Irwin 38 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1985 Irwin 38

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421985 Irwin 38
General
ManufacturerHanseIrwin
Year2006–20101985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyUSA
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP35 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)227 L (60.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1985 Irwin 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1985 Irwin 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1985 Irwin 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1985 Irwin 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1985 Irwin 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1985 Irwin 38 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1985 Irwin 38 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1985 Irwin 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1985 Irwin 38 is 1.28m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1985 Irwin 38 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1985 Irwin 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1985 Irwin 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 42.4% for the 1985 Irwin 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1985 Irwin 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Irwin 38 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Irwin 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1985 Irwin 38