Hanse 342 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

Hanse 342Hanse 342
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationHanse 3421990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerHanseWauquiez
Year2006–20101990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryGermanyFrance
Designerjudel/vrolijk & coJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA10.30 m (33.8 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.20 m (30.2 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.40 m (11.2 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.80 m (5.9 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area52.0 m² (560 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine21 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity100 L (26.4 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity180 L (47.6 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Hanse 342
17.38
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Hanse 342
31.13
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Hanse 342
0.78
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Hanse 342
17.57
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The Hanse 342 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hanse 342 is 0.55m longer than the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32