Hanse 342 vs 1995 Feeling 39 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | 1995 Feeling 39 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Feeling |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1995–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | France |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Philippe Harlé |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 11.80 m (38.7 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.78 m (12.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 7,800 kg (17,196 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 3,000 kg (6,614 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 66.0 m² (710 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and 1995 Feeling 39 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the 1995 Feeling 39 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The 1995 Feeling 39 was designed by Philippe Harlé.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the 1995 Feeling 39 at 11.80m (38.7ft) with a 3.78m beam. The 1995 Feeling 39 is 1.50m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1995 Feeling 39 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The 1995 Feeling 39, with an SA/D of 17.05 and 66.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1995 Feeling 39 has a comfort ratio of 18.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 38.5% for the 1995 Feeling 39, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The 1995 Feeling 39 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1995 Feeling 39 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1995 Feeling 39 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · 1995 Feeling 39