Hanse 342 vs Catalina 387 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Catalina 387
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hanse 342 | Catalina 387 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hanse | Catalina |
| Year | 2006–2010 | 1996–2003 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Germany | USA |
| Designer | judel/vrolijk & co | Gerry Douglas |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) | 11.58 m (38.0 ft) |
| LWL | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) | 3.66 m (12.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) | 1.96 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) | 7,484 kg (16,499 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) | 63.0 m² (678 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 35 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 100 L (26.4 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 180 L (47.6 gal) | 227 L (60.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 7 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hanse 342 and Catalina 387 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hanse 342 is a 2000s design by Hanse from Germany, while the Catalina 387 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The Hanse 342 was penned by judel/vrolijk & co. The Catalina 387 was designed by Gerry Douglas.
In terms of size, the Hanse 342 measures 10.30m (33.8ft) overall with a beam of 3.40m, compared to the Catalina 387 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The Catalina 387 is 1.28m longer than the Hanse 342. The Catalina 387 displaces approximately 41% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hanse 342 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of sail area. The Catalina 387, with an SA/D of 16.73 and 63.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hanse 342 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 387 has a comfort ratio of 18.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 31.1% for the Hanse 342 and 39.4% for the Catalina 387, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hanse 342 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L of water capacity and 100L of fuel. The Catalina 387 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 227L water and 114L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Catalina 387 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Catalina 387 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hanse 342 · Catalina 387