Dufour 40 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

Dufour 40Dufour 40
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

SpecificationDufour 401973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerDufourRanger
Year2007–20121973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryFranceUSA
DesignerUmberto FelciGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA12.05 m (39.5 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL10.55 m (34.6 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.85 m (12.6 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.95 m (6.4 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement7,800 kg (17,196 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,400 kg (5,291 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area68.0 m² (732 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity160 L (42.3 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity300 L (79.3 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths86
Cabins32

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
Dufour 40
17.56
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
Dufour 40
30.77
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
Dufour 40
0.78
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
Dufour 40
16.44
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The Dufour 40 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Dufour 40 is a 2000s design by Dufour from France, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The Dufour 40 was penned by Umberto Felci. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the Dufour 40 measures 12.05m (39.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.85m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The Dufour 40 is 1.99m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The Dufour 40 displaces approximately 64% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the Dufour 40 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.56 and 68.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Dufour 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the Dufour 40 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 30.8% for the Dufour 40 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the Dufour 40 provides 8 berths in 3 cabins with 300L of water capacity and 160L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Dufour 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Dufour 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: Dufour 40 · 1973 Ranger 33